Skip to content
Vision Pro Magazine

Tetris Couldn't Win at This Gaming Ceremony — Another Award Type May Address This Issue

As any significant awards ceremony draws close, one notices an outcry for the addition additional classifications to honor overlooked contributions and fill the spirits of fans with niche passions.

A fellow writer made the case supporting a scary games classification. It would be amazing. The same goes for board games, this being someone's personal cause. Yet I need to apologize in advance if I try to elbow in front because like all blinkered fanatics, I have a cast-iron argument for why my demand stands as crucial and important of all. The demand is this: There should be a classification for brain-teasing titles.

The Genre Classification Challenge

Classifying creative works isn't exact; it’s very subjective, and typically start arguments concluding with vague boundaries. There’s a reason film award organizations don’t do it. However, it represents an unavoidable compromise for the industry of gaming, showing incredible range it's challenging to consider them a single creative category.

For the full spectrum of interactive entertainment excellence to gain proper attention, while allowing diverse titles to receive proper recognition, specific award classifications remain vital.

Present Award Structure

Leading game ceremonies presently include genre categories for Action, Adventure-action titles, RPG experiences, Fighting, Simulation and strategy titles, and Sports/Racing games. Collectively, these six categories successfully include numerous genres, allowing placement accommodating various experiences.

Different situation exists for brain-teasing titles. No suitable classification appears for their placement. Examine these examples from this year’s best games, all very different: structural challenges of one title, fast-paced pattern recognition of another game, engaging interpersonal challenges from additional release. Where could they possibly go among existing types? Unfortunately, nowhere.

Recognition Challenges

Numerous examples exist excellent brain-teasers released every year without proper recognition at major award shows, if they accidentally match classification types such as Handheld titles, VR/AR Game, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

  • One classic puzzle game wasn’t nominated completely that year
  • Another creative title missed out in 2019
  • Well-received sorting experience was overlooked in 2021
  • Just some logic titles scraped into independent or mobile categories

Value of Brain-Teasers

Frequently they represent compact experiences, yet the craft behind logic titles holds tremendous importance. Iconic mobile puzzle games count as most engaged experiences in the world continuing this trend for over a decade.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with well-known building titles competing to become best-selling game of all time; it additionally competes for top gaming experience. Logic titles represent cornerstones to the art of video games, and engaging with diverse game types.

The Solution and Justification

Logic titles wouldn't face that issue. It would be easy to populate a field of five with fascinating, diverse, deserving games every year with ease — perhaps, with difficulty, since numerous excellent numerous deserving experiences.

And to reiterate, these are games without proper classification in important events. Puzzle game makers are working at the demanding boundary interactive creation, creating some of the purest expressions of gaming itself. Similar to film action specialists, they merit acknowledgment. We shouldn't delay decades.

About the author

Lauren Williams

A tech journalist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and digital innovation across Europe.

Vision Pro Magazine

Type to search articles.